Women’s Aging, The Corporate Bricking, and The Fierce Pushback

  • Sofia Aramayo is a writer and strategic communicator for The Gal Project, shaping stories that speak to ambitious women with clarity and intention. With a background in digital marketing and a deep instinct for narrative, she brings thoughtful perspective to every piece she writes.

Women's aging

Women’s aging in today’s workforce shares an uncomfortable similarity with something happening right now in the tech world. Starting May 20, 2026, Amazon will cut off Kindle Store access for all Kindle e-readers and Fire tablets released in 2012 or earlier, affecting approximately 2 million devices worldwide. These devices work perfectly fine. They hold charges, display text beautifully, and have faithfully served their owners for over a decade. Yet someone, somewhere, decided it was time for them to become irrelevant.

Sound familiar?

The Great Kindle Cutoff: Programmed Obsolescence in Action

Amazon recently sent emails to customers informing them that older Kindle models will no longer be able to buy, borrow, or download new books via the Kindle Store after May 20, 2026. The devices themselves aren’t broken. They’re being deliberately disconnected from the ecosystem that gives them purpose.

Kindle owners are furious, and rightfully so. Many longtime users say the change is enough to push them toward different e-reader brands entirely. As one social media user put it: “We evolved from planned obsolescence to planned uselessness! Those Kindles will basically be bricked.”

The message from Amazon is clear: your perfectly functional device has reached its expiration date. Time to buy a new one.

Women’s Aging in the Workforce: The Human Version of Being “Bricked”

Now let’s talk about how this same logic gets applied to women every single day in workplaces around the world.

The parallels are striking and uncomfortable. Just like those pre-2013 Kindles, women over a certain age often find themselves quietly disconnected from the systems that matter. They’re still fully functional. Still capable. Still valuable. But someone, somewhere, decided their time was up.

Let me paint you a picture that might feel painfully familiar. My family member was laid off at 43, a woman with an MBA and stellar performance reviews. But when budget cuts came? Suddenly her “expensive” salary made her a target, while her 28-year-old male colleague with half her experience got to stay because he was “the future of the company.”

The job hunt that followed was a masterclass in humiliation. Recruiters would be enthusiastic on the phone, then visibly deflate when she walked into the room. “We’re looking for someone who can grow with the company” became code for “you’re too old.” Interview after interview, she watched opportunities slip away. Not because she lacked skills, but because she had the audacity to exist in a body that showed she’d been alive long enough to accumulate expertise.

Research from the Journal of Applied Psychology shows that women face age discrimination in hiring as early as their 40s, while men don’t encounter similar bias until their 50s. That’s a full decade head start on being considered “outdated.”

Maybe you’re reading this thinking, “Well, at least I already have a job.” But the bricking doesn’t just happen during layoffs. If you’re over 45 and still employed, you might be experiencing the slow-motion version.

Are you mysteriously passed over for promotions you’re more than qualified for? Do younger colleagues suddenly get invited to the “strategic planning” meetings while you’re tasked with training them? Has your salary somehow plateaued while your male peers continue climbing the compensation ladder? That’s not coincidence; that’s systematic disconnection from the power structures that drive advancement.

The advertising industry laid the groundwork for this perception decades ago. Studies show that women over 50 are significantly underrepresented in marketing and media, despite controlling enormous consumer spending power. The message has been consistent: youth equals relevance, and aging equals obsolescence.

This isn’t about capability. It’s about a culture that’s convinced itself that women have expiration dates, while men just get “seasoned.” It’s about a system that values potential over proven performance, fresh faces over fierce experience.

How the Workforce Treats Experienced Women Like Old Kindles

Let’s break down the uncomfortable similarities:

Functional but unsupported. Those 2012 Kindles still work. They still display books. They still hold a charge for weeks. But without access to new content, they become increasingly isolated from their purpose. Similarly, experienced women often find themselves excluded from new projects, training opportunities, and strategic initiatives. The skills are there. The support isn’t.

Forced upgrades benefit someone else. When companies push out experienced women in favor of younger hires, they’re often doing so for financial reasons too. Younger workers typically accept lower salaries, even when they bring less institutional knowledge and expertise.

The “just buy a new one” mentality. This disposable mindset, where functional things are discarded simply because newer versions exist, mirrors how women’s aging is treated in many industries. Rather than valuing experience and investing in continued development, organizations often find it easier to simply “upgrade” to a younger model.

The Numbers Don’t Lie: Age Discrimination Hits Women Harder

AARP research found that 64% of workers over 45 have witnessed or experienced age discrimination in the workplace. Women reported experiencing this bias at higher rates and at younger ages than their male counterparts.

Harvard Business Review analysis reveals that ageism intersects with sexism in particularly damaging ways. While men with gray hair are often described as “distinguished” or “experienced,” women showing visible signs of aging are more likely to be perceived as less competent, less energetic, and less promotable.

The expectations placed on women’s aging in professional settings create an impossible bind:

  • Stay current with technology and trends, but don’t seem like you’re “trying too hard.”
  • Maintain youthful energy, but don’t be “inauthentic.”
  • Have decades of experience, but don’t seem “set in your ways.”
  • Command respect, but don’t appear “intimidating.”

It’s exhausting. And unlike a Kindle, you can’t just download a software update to meet these contradictory demands.

Fighting Back: Resisting Obsolescence in All Its Forms

The good news? People are pushing back against programmed obsolescence, both in the technological world and women’s aging in the workforce.

Here’s what I love about this moment we’re living in. People are getting absolutely fed up with being told their worth has an expiration date. And when I say people, I mean both the Kindle owners raising hell about Amazon’s decision AND the women who are refusing to quietly accept workplace obsolescence.

Let’s start with the tech rebellion, because it’s honestly inspiring. Within days of Amazon’s announcement, Kindle users weren’t just complaining, they were organizing. Reddit forums exploded with workarounds, tutorials for sideloading books, and mass migrations to competitors like Kobo and Onyx. One user created a viral thread titled “How to Make Your ‘Obsolete’ Kindle Outlive Amazon’s Greed,” complete with step-by-step guides that got thousands of shares.

The message was crystal clear: Just because you say we’re done doesn’t mean we are.

This isn’t Amazon’s first rodeo with planned obsolescence, either. Remember when they remotely deleted George Orwell’s “1984” from Kindles without warning? (The irony was not lost on anyone.) But this time feels different. Consumers are connecting the dots between their bricked Kindles and Apple’s notorious iPhone throttling scandal, where Apple literally slowed down older phones to force upgrades until they got hit with massive lawsuits and had to pay billions in settlements.

The tide is turning on disposability culture, and it’s not just about gadgets.

The Rise of the “Experienced and Excellent” Movement

In the workplace, women aren’t taking this lying down either. Have you heard about the “Gray Ceiling” movement? It’s a growing coalition of professional women over 45 who are systematically challenging ageist hiring practices through class-action lawsuits, public naming and shaming of discriminatory companies, and creating their own networks that bypass traditional gatekeepers entirely.

Take the “Over 45 and Thriving” LinkedIn group, which has exploded to over 85,000 members sharing job leads, calling out age discrimination, and celebrating career pivots that happen in their 50s, 60s, and beyond. These women aren’t asking for permission to remain relevant—they’re creating their own definition of relevance.

The “Right to Repair” Our Own Narratives

But here’s where it gets really juicy, and why I think this moment matters so much for all of us. The same “Right to Repair” movement that’s forcing tech companies to stop bricking our devices is inspiring a parallel movement for human obsolescence.

European legislation now requires companies to design products that last longer and provide repair options instead of forced upgrades. The EU literally said “Stop making things disposable just because it’s profitable.” Meanwhile, organizations like AARP are pushing for similar accountability in employment practices—transparency about hiring criteria, protection against age-coded job descriptions, and consequences for companies that systematically push out experienced workers.

The Great Corporate Exodus: When Women Over 50 Say “Screw This” and Build Their Own Empire

But perhaps the most beautiful rebellion happening right now is the one where women are straight-up walking away from systems that don’t value them and creating their own. Meet the fastest-growing demographic of entrepreneurs in America: women over 50.

The numbers are staggering and frankly, thrilling. According to recent data, 35% of entrepreneurs and small business owners are in the 50-59 age bracket, with women leading this charge. We’re talking about women launching startups that succeed at roughly the same rate as those founded by people in their 20s, not consulting or side-hustles.

What’s happening? Women are getting laid off, hitting that gray ceiling, or simply looking around their corporate jobs and thinking, “There has to be something better than this.” And instead of quietly accepting obsolescence, they’re building what didn’t exist for them in the first place.

Take the Reddit thread from a daughter whose mom was laid off after 30 years with the same company—a story that’s become painfully common. But instead of lamenting the injustice (though there’s plenty to lament), these women are channeling their fury into something unprecedented. They’re choosing autonomy over ageism, meaning over mediocrity, and self-definition over someone else’s narrow view of their worth.

What makes this rebellion so powerful is that these women aren’t starting from scratch—they’re starting with decades of experience, established networks, and often, significant capital. Research shows that women entrepreneurs over 50 are actually less likely to face financial challenges than their younger counterparts, with 45% reporting smoother financial journeys since starting their businesses. They’ve been in the workforce long enough to understand what works, what doesn’t, and most importantly, what needs to exist.

The irony is delicious: the same corporate world that’s trying to obsolete these women is about to discover that it just launched its fiercest competition. These aren’t women starting businesses because they have to—they’re doing it because they finally can. And they’re not starting late; they’re starting with clarity.

We’re Learning to Hack the System

Just like those Kindle users who refuse to be cut off from their digital libraries, women are finding creative ways around the systems designed to sideline us. They’re starting consulting firms at 55. Launching passion projects that become million-dollar businesses at 48. Running for office for the first time at 62.

The parallel is beautiful and powerful: obsolescence is a choice, not a biological inevitability. Whether we’re talking about perfectly functional devices or perfectly capable women, someone else’s declaration that our time is up doesn’t have to become our reality.

Because here’s what I know for sure—when you try to brick something (or someone) that’s still got plenty of life left, you better be prepared for the resistance. And sister, we’re just getting started.

Categories: